Minimax ( 12 years ago )
The concept biehnd upskirting relies on the fact that it's non-consensual.  If a guy just wanted to see a tight panty-clad ass he could pick up a Victoria's Secret catalog.  Like rape, upskirting is not about arousal but humiliation and power, allowing a photographer to be  a sexual aggressor but without actually having to confront a woman. Can a couple of responsible adults practice a little consensual upskirt play with each other?  Of course.Is it appropriate when it's simulated non-consensual?  Fuck no.  Upskirting, like rape, has no place in the whimsical world of erotic sims and iPhone apps.  Rape fantasy might work in the bedroom between two consenting adults, but it should never be a product to be packaged and sold.I'm doubly disturbed that this is an iPhone app.  I mean, if this kind of erotica must exist, why can't it be kept at home with the rest of someone's fap material?  This really doesn't need to be an on-the-go accessory.  Can you picture how you'd feel sitting next to a guy on the bus playing this  game ?

Sylvain ( 12 years ago )
Tram,Are you saying that there were potviise comments on the last two sets from members??? I freely admit that I love Family Guy!!! However I also like The Simpsons, Scooby Doo, The Flintstones, The Jetsons and some Iron Giant. Hey if it is asking too much for you to do Family Guy, then like numerous other members of your paid site, I will cancell and move on. Your art is perfect its just that the subject matter frequently does not meet up to your paid sites members expectations. If indeed Tram you are bored with giving the paid site members what they want and have paid for, perhaps it is time for you to get into another line of work! On the job I frequently have to do things I do not like and after all that is why they call it WORK and not FUN!

Asri ( 12 years ago )
Subtracting a negative nbuemr is just a funny way to look at adding. This understanding comes prior to any high "concept" from the "cognitive science of mathematics," or philosophy of mathematics.Philosophy of mathematics is something mathematicians, who know their subject, dispute over after the heat of the day has passed. It's a way of elegantly organizing what they have learned. It doesn't help newbies learn, sorry.We're not really discussing maths. We're discussing how the mind learns. It isn't identical to how a subject is scientifically organized.A subject (such as maths) is scientifically organized "top-down," or deductively. Mathematicians have arrived at abstractions, and they use these to organize the field.BUT a student (any student, bright or mediocre) who is new to the subject is in a different position. He learns "bottom-up," or inductively. High abstractions cannot have any meaning to him, until they can be connected to more concrete material that he understands.Here is a simplistic example for the sake of clarity: How do you teach a child who doesn't already know it that 2 + 2 = 4?The good mathematician/good mathematics education major might answer in this fashion: "First, the child must learn the concept of sets; the sets of whole nbuemrs; the commutative property; and the concept of integers. I recommend that he read the chapter on sets first."But the good teacher would answer this way:"First, give the child two oranges, and hold a different pair of oranges in your hand. Next, have him count the oranges in his hand (2), and then the ones in your hand (2). Finally, give him your oranges, saying, 'My two added to your two is how many?' and have him count all the oranges (4)."The same distinction between "good science" (or a good education major paper) and "good teaching" applies, mutatis mutandis, to all subjects and all age groups. (But NOT all IQ levels - nothing can be taught to a congenital moron.)The simple is not explained by means of the complicated. The abstract is not explained by means of the more abstract.Mathematically, you are (as far as I can make out) correct about the concept of the closure property: this concept organizes known facts elegantly. The point is, students who don't know these facts will not learn them by being exposed exclusively to this piece of esoterica. A teacher will have superior results if he gets down on the ground level with his students and sees through their eyes. They have to WORK UP TO the closure property, not DOWN FROM it.